Gandhi and Secularism – by Matthew Bain

Secularism is a term which is easily misunderstood, and perhaps nowhere does this have worse consequences than in India. The comparison is often made between India, described as a secular state, and Pakistan, founded as a homeland for the subcontinent’s Muslims. India’s secularism is ascribed in part to Gandhi, and it is certainly true that Gandhi wanted the Indian state to be the homeland for Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians alike. But Mark Tully has pointed out that, far from wanting a state in which religion is stripped from public life – most peoples’ concept of secularism – Gandhi’s hope was for a state in which truly religious values permeate all aspects of life, including the political sphere.

After his success in South Africa, Gandhi’s first public speech in India, at the opening of the Hindu University in Benares, demonstrates how his political discourse was saturated with religious vocabulary:

“Truth is the end; love a means thereto . . . The Golden Rule is to dare to do the right at any cost. No amount of speeches will make us fit for self-government, it is only our conduct that will fit us for it . . . If we trust and fear God, we shall have to fear no-one, not maharajahs, not viceroys, not the detectives, not even King George.”

Gandhi’s concept of religion was a pluralistic one:

“I believe in the fundamental Truth of all great religions of the world. I believe they are all God-given and I believe they were necessary for the people to whom these religions were revealed. And I believe that if only we could all of us read the scriptures of the different faiths from the standpoint of the followers of these faiths, we should find that they were at the bottom all one and were all helpful to one another.”

Gandhi’s vision of the secular state is a place where religious values and discourse are cherished and respected in all spheres of life, the public as well as the private, but in which no single religion is allowed to dominate the others. This latter clause prevented Gandhi from supporting the Hindu nationalist (Hindutva) movement which is now so prominent on the Indian political scene. The Hindutva groups see secularism as an enemy because it is a barrier to Hindu hegemony.

Opponents of secularism also include Islamic revivalist movements such as the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Jamaat-i-Islami in Pakistan. According to their ideology:

“Secularism was equated with godlessness, an absence or denial of religious values, rather than a separation of church and state in order to guarantee religious freedom in pluralistic societies.” (John Esposito, Islam – The Straight Path OUP 1998)

Unfortunately modern atheists too have misunderstood secularism, believing it means that no one should be allowed to employ religious language in their political discourse, which would have prevented Gandhi from speaking! Admittedly there is much to dislike about certain forms of religious discourse in politics, writing as I do from the standpoint of a European observing the US presidential elections. It shows me the merit of Alistair Campbell’s famous caveat to Tony Blair: “We don’t do God”.

Gandhi’s religious discourse was accepted by his audience, and was effective in motivating them politically because they were, by-and-large, religious people. The deployment of religious language in modern British political life would be doomed to failure, because it would alienate the atheists, it wouldn’t satisfy the fundamentalists, and it would fail to motivate the masses. Perhaps all we are left with is our own private faith to motivate our actions in the political sphere, and a recognition of Wittgenstein’s deep spiritual truth:

“Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent”.

Tags: , ,

Categories: Spirituality & Religion


Subscribe to our RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

4 Comments on “Gandhi and Secularism – by Matthew Bain”

  1. john paul
    September 22, 2009 at 10:28 am #

    By reading the above description on about Gandhi’s secularism . one can analysis that why did Gandhi persuaded for caliphat movement in India . basically Gandhi was endowed with Hindutva Ideology. He knew that only Hindu Religion would have Nationalism in India.


  2. matthewbain
    October 20, 2009 at 8:39 pm #

    An interesting twist on the concept of secularism is provided by Madeleine Bunting writing in The Guardian

    Looking at the work of Amartya Sen and Michael Sandel,she argues that the modern state needs to propound positive conceptions of the common good. She argues against the normal idea of a secular state that stands back with a misguided notion of neutrality, permitting any good or bad to dominate. This notion of the state is associated with the free market philosophy of Hayek and Friedman, and its morality is as bankrupt as their economic theories.

    The state must be an agent and defender of the common good, which it should define in positive terms. The advantage of this theory is that it can appeal to the religious and non-religious alike.


  3. Austn
    April 12, 2016 at 4:34 am #

    Gandhi’s idea of secularism would have been fine if India were not to be divided. Still continuing Gandhi’s secularism even after the partition of India on religion basis is a blunder.



  1. Jinnah and Gandhi | Indian Liberals - December 17, 2010

    […] he sought a lot of inspiration from religious texts both in his personal and political lives. As Mark Tully pointed out, Gandhi hoped for a state in which truly religious values permeate all aspects of life, including […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: